TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Mt Gilead Federal Credit Union vs W S S C Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Mt Gilead Federal Credit Union

Washington, District of Columbia · Under $100 million in assets

93of 100
Very strong

Credit union

W S S C Federal Credit Union

Laurel, Maryland · Under $100 million in assets

50of 100
Below average

Metric by metric

MeasureMt Gilead Federal Credit UnionW S S C Federal Credit Union
TellerScore93 (stronger)50
Capital cushion100 (stronger)51
Loan quality100 (stronger)35
Earnings66 (stronger)14
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)99
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)79
Peer percentile94th9th
Total assets$78K$35.4M
Deposits / shares$63K$31.9M
Capital ratio17.49% (stronger)10.13%
Problem loans0.00% (stronger)1.95%
Net charge-offs0.00% (stronger)1.32%
Return on assets1.14% (stronger)-0.16%
Loans ÷ deposits35.0% (stronger)61.4%
Uninsured deposits0.0% (stronger)5.0%
Offices14
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Mt Gilead Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (93 vs 50). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Mt Gilead Federal Credit Union leads on 7 and W S S C Federal Credit Union on 0. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions