Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Municipal Trust and Savings Bank vs 2 Rivers Area Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Municipal Trust and Savings Bank | 2 Rivers Area Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 95 (stronger) | 66 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 57 |
| Loan quality | 99 (stronger) | 74 |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 34 |
| Funding & liquidity | 67 | 96 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 91 |
| Peer percentile | 99th | 32nd |
| Total assets | $382.2M | $27.7M |
| Deposits / shares | $305.7M | $25.1M |
| Capital ratio | 15.56% (stronger) | 10.68% |
| Problem loans | 0.04% (stronger) | 0.78% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.27% |
| Return on assets | 2.96% (stronger) | 0.35% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 84.3% | 64.7% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 22.6% | 6.4% (stronger) |
| Offices | 2 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 5.1% | — |
Municipal Trust and Savings Bank has the higher TellerScore (95 vs 66). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Municipal Trust and Savings Bank leads on 5 and 2 Rivers Area Credit Union on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.