Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Mutual Federal Bank vs Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union
Credit union
Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union
Chicago, Illinois · Under $100 million in assets
Metric by metric
| Measure | Mutual Federal Bank | Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 71 | 100 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 100 | 100 |
| Loan quality | 64 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 44 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 50 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 89 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 42nd | 100th |
| Total assets | $96.5M | $2.0M |
| Deposits / shares | $63.5M | $1.4M |
| Capital ratio | 16.34% (stronger) | 15.53% |
| Problem loans | 1.09% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | 0.61% | 3.21% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 129.8% | 35.8% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 6.4% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 1 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 0.0% | — |
Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (100 vs 71). On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Mutual Federal Bank leads on 1 and Israel Methcomm Federal Credit Union on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.