TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

NBT Bank, National Association vs Leatherstocking Region Federal Credit Union

Bank

NBT Bank, National Association

Norwich, New York · $10 billion – $100 billion

64of 100
Moderate

Credit union

Leatherstocking Region Federal Credit Union

Cooperstown, New York · $100 million – $1 billion

78of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureNBT Bank, National AssociationLeatherstocking Region Federal Credit Union
TellerScore6478 (stronger)
Capital cushion4571 (stronger)
Loan quality82 (stronger)77
Earnings6872 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity4493 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage9393
Peer percentile46th74th
Total assets$16.1B$107.7M
Deposits / shares$13.7B$94.6M
Capital ratio9.49%12.06% (stronger)
Problem loans0.55% (stronger)0.68%
Net charge-offs0.16% (stronger)0.66%
Return on assets1.21%1.31% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits85.8%67.5% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits42.5%1.6% (stronger)
Offices1741
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)127—
Complaints per $1B deposits9.3—
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)23.4%—

Leatherstocking Region Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (78 vs 64). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), NBT Bank, National Association leads on 2 and Leatherstocking Region Federal Credit Union on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions