Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
New Haven Bank vs Sikorsky Financial Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | New Haven Bank | Sikorsky Financial Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 53 | 84 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 32 | 79 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 91 | 92 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 27 | 77 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 36 | 78 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 95 | 97 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 9th | 93rd |
| Total assets | $200.0M | $1.5B |
| Deposits / shares | $155.1M | $1.3B |
| Capital ratio | 8.23% | 12.93% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.27% | 0.25% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.03% (stronger) | 0.11% |
| Return on assets | 0.18% | 1.42% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 107.6% | 82.6% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 30.0% | 4.7% (stronger) |
| Offices | 2 | 11 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Sikorsky Financial Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (84 vs 53). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), New Haven Bank leads on 1 and Sikorsky Financial Credit Union on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.