Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
New Market Bank vs Think Mutual Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | New Market Bank | Think Mutual Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 74 | 86 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 41 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 92 |
| Earnings | 65 (stronger) | 45 |
| Funding & liquidity | 89 | 95 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 98 |
| Peer percentile | 57th | 97th |
| Total assets | $196.0M | $2.2B |
| Deposits / shares | $177.5M | $1.9B |
| Capital ratio | 9.11% | 16.25% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.25% |
| Net charge-offs | -0.00% (stronger) | 0.05% |
| Return on assets | 1.13% (stronger) | 0.63% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 65.6% | 64.8% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 19.8% | 5.8% (stronger) |
| Offices | 3 | 9 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 2.1% | 12.2% |
Think Mutual Bank has the higher TellerScore (86 vs 74). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), New Market Bank leads on 3 and Think Mutual Bank on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.