TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

New York Times Employees Federal Credit Union vs Gha Federal Credit Union

Credit union

New York Times Employees Federal Credit Union

New York, New York · Under $100 million in assets

63of 100
Moderate

Credit union

Gha Federal Credit Union

Greenwich, Connecticut · Under $100 million in assets

91of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureNew York Times Employees Federal Credit UnionGha Federal Credit Union
TellerScore6391 (stronger)
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality081 (stronger)
Earnings4980 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100100
Problem-loan coverage8298 (stronger)
Peer percentile26th90th
Total assets$73.6M$29.7M
Deposits / shares$61.4M$24.4M
Capital ratio17.16%17.51% (stronger)
Problem loans3.04%0.56% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.21%0.18% (stronger)
Return on assets0.72%1.50% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits47.9%41.3% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits10.8%0.9% (stronger)
Offices21
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Gha Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (91 vs 63). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), New York Times Employees Federal Credit Union leads on 0 and Gha Federal Credit Union on 7. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions