TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Numerica Credit Union vs Responders Emergency Services Credit Union

Credit union

Numerica Credit Union

Spokane Valley, Washington · $1 billion – $10 billion

74of 100
Strong

Credit union

Responders Emergency Services Credit Union

Spokane, Washington · Under $100 million in assets

87of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureNumerica Credit UnionResponders Emergency Services Credit Union
TellerScore7487 (stronger)
Capital cushion70100 (stronger)
Loan quality88100 (stronger)
Earnings60 (stronger)40
Funding & liquidity6291 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage95100 (stronger)
Peer percentile72nd83rd
Total assets$4.3B$56.2M
Deposits / shares$3.7B$46.3M
Capital ratio12.03%17.32% (stronger)
Problem loans0.35%0.01% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.23%-0.01% (stronger)
Return on assets1.00% (stronger)0.50%
Loans ÷ deposits96.0%69.3% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits16.8%7.1% (stronger)
Offices182
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)39.5%—

Responders Emergency Services Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (87 vs 74). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Numerica Credit Union leads on 1 and Responders Emergency Services Credit Union on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions