Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Ohnward Bank & Trust vs Rolling Hills Bank & Trust
Metric by metric
| Measure | Ohnward Bank & Trust | Rolling Hills Bank & Trust |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 74 | 77 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 76 (stronger) | 68 |
| Loan quality | 80 | 90 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 76 | 78 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 46 | 57 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 93 | 97 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 57th | 68th |
| Total assets | $499.1M | $484.4M |
| Deposits / shares | $417.6M | $416.2M |
| Capital ratio | 12.58% (stronger) | 11.85% |
| Problem loans | 0.60% | 0.30% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.01% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.39% | 1.45% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 92.9% | 90.9% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 33.7% | 26.2% (stronger) |
| Offices | 6 | 12 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 4.3% |
Rolling Hills Bank & Trust has the higher TellerScore (77 vs 74). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Ohnward Bank & Trust leads on 1 and Rolling Hills Bank & Trust on 6. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.