Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Optum Bank, Inc. vs Square Financial Services, Inc.
Metric by metric
| Measure | Optum Bank, Inc. | Square Financial Services, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 93 (stronger) | 84 |
| Capital cushion | 82 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 93 (stronger) | 78 |
| Earnings | 100 | 100 |
| Funding & liquidity | 100 (stronger) | 33 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 98 | 99 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 100th | 95th |
| Total assets | $21.4B | $2.1B |
| Deposits / shares | $16.5B | $559.3M |
| Capital ratio | 13.22% | 65.19% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.21% (stronger) | 0.67% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.23% (stronger) | 14.66% |
| Return on assets | 2.55% | 37.85% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 59.7% (stronger) | 230.0% |
| Uninsured deposits | 3.8% (stronger) | 30.4% |
| Offices | 1 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | 654 | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | 39.6 | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Optum Bank, Inc. has the higher TellerScore (93 vs 84). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Optum Bank, Inc. leads on 5 and Square Financial Services, Inc. on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.