Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Petefish, Skiles & Co. vs Table Grove State Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Petefish, Skiles & Co. | Table Grove State Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 75 (stronger) | 57 |
| Capital cushion | 41 | 75 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 95 (stronger) | 45 |
| Earnings | 88 (stronger) | 13 |
| Funding & liquidity | 80 | 80 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 98 (stronger) | 82 |
| Peer percentile | 61st | 16th |
| Total assets | $501.6M | $45.9M |
| Deposits / shares | $439.8M | $40.2M |
| Capital ratio | 9.12% | 12.49% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.14% (stronger) | 1.65% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.01% (stronger) | 0.30% |
| Return on assets | 1.69% (stronger) | -0.19% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 80.0% (stronger) | 80.6% |
| Uninsured deposits | 9.9% (stronger) | 13.0% |
| Offices | 6 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 17.9% | — |
Petefish, Skiles & Co. has the higher TellerScore (75 vs 57). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Petefish, Skiles & Co. leads on 6 and Table Grove State Bank on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.