Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Petefish, Skiles & Co. vs Warren-Boynton State Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Petefish, Skiles & Co. | Warren-Boynton State Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 75 | 79 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 41 | 71 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 95 (stronger) | 86 |
| Earnings | 88 (stronger) | 81 |
| Funding & liquidity | 80 (stronger) | 72 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 98 (stronger) | 95 |
| Peer percentile | 61st | 75th |
| Total assets | $501.6M | $234.5M |
| Deposits / shares | $439.8M | $201.4M |
| Capital ratio | 9.12% | 12.08% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.14% (stronger) | 0.41% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.01% (stronger) | 0.01% |
| Return on assets | 1.69% (stronger) | 1.52% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 80.0% (stronger) | 83.4% |
| Uninsured deposits | 9.9% (stronger) | 18.8% |
| Offices | 6 | 4 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 17.9% | — |
Warren-Boynton State Bank has the higher TellerScore (79 vs 75). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Petefish, Skiles & Co. leads on 5 and Warren-Boynton State Bank on 2. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.