Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Pibank, National Association vs Climate First Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Pibank, National Association | Climate First Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 63 | 68 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 47 | 47 |
| Loan quality | 96 | 96 |
| Earnings | 1 | 69 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 100 (stronger) | 41 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 99 (stronger) | 98 |
| Peer percentile | 30th | 49th |
| Total assets | $2.4B | $1.9B |
| Deposits / shares | $2.1B | $1.5B |
| Capital ratio | 9.71% (stronger) | 9.66% |
| Problem loans | 0.13% | 0.12% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.05% (stronger) | 0.13% |
| Return on assets | -0.49% | 1.22% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 53.3% (stronger) | 107.2% |
| Uninsured deposits | 9.9% (stronger) | 26.4% |
| Offices | 1 | 4 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 15.2% | 17.9% |
Climate First Bank has the higher TellerScore (68 vs 63). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Pibank, National Association leads on 4 and Climate First Bank on 3. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.