TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Red Canoe Credit Union vs Seattle Metropolitan Credit Union

Credit union

Red Canoe Credit Union

Longview, Washington · $1 billion – $10 billion

72of 100
Strong

Credit union

Seattle Metropolitan Credit Union

Seattle, Washington · $1 billion – $10 billion

60of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureRed Canoe Credit UnionSeattle Metropolitan Credit Union
TellerScore72 (stronger)60
Capital cushion73 (stronger)65
Loan quality80 (stronger)79
Earnings52 (stronger)21
Funding & liquidity68 (stronger)53
Problem-loan coverage90 (stronger)89
Peer percentile66th25th
Total assets$1.2B$1.2B
Deposits / shares$1.0B$921.1M
Capital ratio12.28% (stronger)11.50%
Problem loans0.60% (stronger)0.63%
Net charge-offs0.47% (stronger)1.06%
Return on assets0.80% (stronger)0.04%
Loans ÷ deposits92.7% (stronger)107.3%
Uninsured deposits9.6% (stronger)14.6%
Offices69
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)14.4%47.9%

Red Canoe Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (72 vs 60). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Red Canoe Credit Union leads on 7 and Seattle Metropolitan Credit Union on 0. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions