Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Rhinebeck Bank vs Alma Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Rhinebeck Bank | Alma Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 69 (stronger) | 57 |
| Capital cushion | 59 (stronger) | 53 |
| Loan quality | 87 (stronger) | 72 |
| Earnings | 53 (stronger) | 46 |
| Funding & liquidity | 66 (stronger) | 34 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 95 (stronger) | 86 |
| Peer percentile | 53rd | 16th |
| Total assets | $1.5B | $1.6B |
| Deposits / shares | $1.3B | $1.3B |
| Capital ratio | 10.93% (stronger) | 10.35% |
| Problem loans | 0.38% (stronger) | 0.84% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.14% | 0.12% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.82% (stronger) | 0.66% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 70.5% (stronger) | 100.3% |
| Uninsured deposits | 36.5% (stronger) | 38.3% |
| Offices | 13 | 13 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 4.5% | — |
Rhinebeck Bank has the higher TellerScore (69 vs 57). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Rhinebeck Bank leads on 6 and Alma Bank on 1. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.