TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Rio Grande Federal Credit Union vs Bulab Employees Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Rio Grande Federal Credit Union

Grand Junction, Colorado · Under $100 million in assets

97of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Bulab Employees Federal Credit Union

Memphis, Tennessee · Under $100 million in assets

72of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureRio Grande Federal Credit UnionBulab Employees Federal Credit Union
TellerScore97 (stronger)72
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality99 (stronger)44
Earnings88 (stronger)43
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)87
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)96
Peer percentile98th44th
Total assets$80.8M$2.2M
Deposits / shares$62.8M$1.4M
Capital ratio21.99%35.00% (stronger)
Problem loans0.03% (stronger)1.68%
Net charge-offs0.72%-0.21% (stronger)
Return on assets1.71% (stronger)0.58%
Loans ÷ deposits44.4% (stronger)73.1%
Uninsured deposits8.7%0.0% (stronger)
Offices31
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Rio Grande Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (97 vs 72). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Rio Grande Federal Credit Union leads on 4 and Bulab Employees Federal Credit Union on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions