Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Rolling Hills Bank & Trust vs TruBank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Rolling Hills Bank & Trust | TruBank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 77 (stronger) | 56 |
| Capital cushion | 68 (stronger) | 42 |
| Loan quality | 90 (stronger) | 56 |
| Earnings | 78 (stronger) | 64 |
| Funding & liquidity | 57 | 61 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 97 (stronger) | 79 |
| Peer percentile | 68th | 13th |
| Total assets | $484.4M | $494.6M |
| Deposits / shares | $416.2M | $366.1M |
| Capital ratio | 11.85% (stronger) | 9.23% |
| Problem loans | 0.30% (stronger) | 1.33% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.45% (stronger) | 1.09% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 90.9% | 77.9% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 26.2% (stronger) | 34.2% |
| Offices | 12 | 8 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 4.3% | 4.3% |
Rolling Hills Bank & Trust has the higher TellerScore (77 vs 56). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Rolling Hills Bank & Trust leads on 5 and TruBank on 2. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.