TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Rutgers Federal Credit Union vs United Poles Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Rutgers Federal Credit Union

New Brunswick, New Jersey · Under $100 million in assets

85of 100
Very strong

Credit union

United Poles Federal Credit Union

Perth Amboy, New Jersey · Under $100 million in assets

28of 100
Low

Metric by metric

MeasureRutgers Federal Credit UnionUnited Poles Federal Credit Union
TellerScore85 (stronger)28
Capital cushion76 (stronger)20
Loan quality87 (stronger)1
Earnings82 (stronger)41
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)69
Problem-loan coverage91 (stronger)28
Peer percentile77th1st
Total assets$77.4M$72.3M
Deposits / shares$67.0M$66.6M
Capital ratio12.64% (stronger)6.95%
Problem loans0.39% (stronger)2.96%
Net charge-offs0.52%0.17% (stronger)
Return on assets1.54% (stronger)0.53%
Loans ÷ deposits31.6% (stronger)91.0%
Uninsured deposits6.2% (stronger)7.7%
Offices13
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—0.0%

Rutgers Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (85 vs 28). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Rutgers Federal Credit Union leads on 6 and United Poles Federal Credit Union on 1. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions