TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

San Francisco Federal Credit Union vs Upward Credit Union

Credit union

San Francisco Federal Credit Union

San Francisco, California · $1 billion – $10 billion

86of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Upward Credit Union

Burlingame, California · Under $100 million in assets

68of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureSan Francisco Federal Credit UnionUpward Credit Union
TellerScore86 (stronger)68
Capital cushion86 (stronger)64
Loan quality95 (stronger)62
Earnings65 (stronger)49
Funding & liquidity9198 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage99 (stronger)89
Peer percentile95th36th
Total assets$1.6B$92.7M
Deposits / shares$1.2B$79.5M
Capital ratio13.63% (stronger)11.44%
Problem loans0.15% (stronger)1.15%
Net charge-offs0.13% (stronger)0.15%
Return on assets1.12% (stronger)0.71%
Loans ÷ deposits69.1%62.7% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits8.5%1.4% (stronger)
Offices32
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)3.3%—

San Francisco Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (86 vs 68). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), San Francisco Federal Credit Union leads on 5 and Upward Credit Union on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions