TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

San Mateo City Employees Federal Credit Union vs San Francisco Federal Credit Union

Credit union

San Mateo City Employees Federal Credit Union

San Mateo, California · Under $100 million in assets

87of 100
Very strong

Credit union

San Francisco Federal Credit Union

San Francisco, California · $1 billion – $10 billion

86of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureSan Mateo City Employees Federal Credit UnionSan Francisco Federal Credit Union
TellerScore87 (stronger)86
Capital cushion100 (stronger)86
Loan quality100 (stronger)95
Earnings3465 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)91
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)99
Peer percentile83rd95th
Total assets$31.8M$1.6B
Deposits / shares$25.9M$1.2B
Capital ratio18.36% (stronger)13.63%
Problem loans0.00% (stronger)0.15%
Net charge-offs1.53%0.13% (stronger)
Return on assets0.34%1.12% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits18.2% (stronger)69.1%
Uninsured deposits12.7%8.5% (stronger)
Offices23
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—3.3%

San Mateo City Employees Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (87 vs 86). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), San Mateo City Employees Federal Credit Union leads on 4 and San Francisco Federal Credit Union on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions