TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

San Mateo City Employees Federal Credit Union vs Stanford Federal Credit Union

Credit union

San Mateo City Employees Federal Credit Union

San Mateo, California · Under $100 million in assets

87of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Stanford Federal Credit Union

Palo Alto, California · $1 billion – $10 billion

73of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureSan Mateo City Employees Federal Credit UnionStanford Federal Credit Union
TellerScore87 (stronger)73
Capital cushion100 (stronger)62
Loan quality100 (stronger)93
Earnings3460 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)61
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)97
Peer percentile83rd70th
Total assets$31.8M$4.6B
Deposits / shares$25.9M$3.6B
Capital ratio18.36% (stronger)11.21%
Problem loans0.00% (stronger)0.21%
Net charge-offs1.53%0.14% (stronger)
Return on assets0.34%1.01% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits18.2% (stronger)96.7%
Uninsured deposits12.7% (stronger)17.5%
Offices26
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—7.6%

San Mateo City Employees Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (87 vs 73). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), San Mateo City Employees Federal Credit Union leads on 5 and Stanford Federal Credit Union on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions