Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Security Bank and Trust Company vs The Lauderdale County Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Security Bank and Trust Company | The Lauderdale County Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 79 (stronger) | 67 |
| Capital cushion | 59 | 65 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 99 (stronger) | 50 |
| Earnings | 85 (stronger) | 56 |
| Funding & liquidity | 62 | 98 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 87 |
| Peer percentile | 88th | 30th |
| Total assets | $1.7B | $67.5M |
| Deposits / shares | $1.4B | $59.9M |
| Capital ratio | 10.92% | 11.54% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.02% (stronger) | 1.50% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.01% | -0.01% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.61% (stronger) | 0.89% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 83.8% | 50.9% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 27.5% | 16.7% (stronger) |
| Offices | 11 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 7.5% | — |
Security Bank and Trust Company has the higher TellerScore (79 vs 67). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Security Bank and Trust Company leads on 3 and The Lauderdale County Bank on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.
Where both have branches
- Ripley, TN