Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Security State Bank vs Atascosa Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Security State Bank | Atascosa Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 74 (stronger) | 61 |
| Capital cushion | 57 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 4 |
| Earnings | 75 (stronger) | 44 |
| Funding & liquidity | 50 | 85 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 91 (stronger) | 84 |
| Peer percentile | 74th | 19th |
| Total assets | $1.1B | $81.7M |
| Deposits / shares | $1.0B | $71.5M |
| Capital ratio | 10.74% | 15.25% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 2.89% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.04% | -0.43% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.37% (stronger) | 0.60% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 54.7% | 28.6% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 63.4% | 28.4% (stronger) |
| Offices | 8 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Security State Bank has the higher TellerScore (74 vs 61). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Security State Bank leads on 3 and Atascosa Bank on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.