Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Sewickley Savings Bank vs Greater Pittsburgh Federal Credit Union
Credit union
Greater Pittsburgh Federal Credit Union
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets
Metric by metric
| Measure | Sewickley Savings Bank | Greater Pittsburgh Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 67 | 93 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 100 | 100 |
| Loan quality | 9 | 87 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 53 | 83 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 100 | 100 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 95 | 98 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 34th | 94th |
| Total assets | $316.3M | $76.7M |
| Deposits / shares | $222.4M | $64.6M |
| Capital ratio | 23.76% (stronger) | 15.35% |
| Problem loans | 2.73% | 0.40% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.19% |
| Return on assets | 0.82% | 1.57% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 29.8% (stronger) | 38.3% |
| Uninsured deposits | 7.6% | 0.8% (stronger) |
| Offices | 3 | 6 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Greater Pittsburgh Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (93 vs 67). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Sewickley Savings Bank leads on 3 and Greater Pittsburgh Federal Credit Union on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.