TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Shore United Bank, National Association vs The Queenstown Bank of Maryland

Bank

Shore United Bank, National Association

Easton, Maryland · $1 billion – $10 billion

61of 100
Moderate

Bank

The Queenstown Bank of Maryland

Queenstown, Maryland · $100 million – $1 billion

77of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureShore United Bank, National AssociationThe Queenstown Bank of Maryland
TellerScore6177 (stronger)
Capital cushion5066 (stronger)
Loan quality5696 (stronger)
Earnings71 (stronger)54
Funding & liquidity6781 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage8299 (stronger)
Peer percentile24th68th
Total assets$6.1B$729.5M
Deposits / shares$5.4B$648.8M
Capital ratio10.00%11.60% (stronger)
Problem loans1.32%0.12% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.04%0.01% (stronger)
Return on assets1.28% (stronger)0.86%
Loans ÷ deposits89.4%72.4% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits18.0% (stronger)21.0%
Offices409
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)16.7%4.6%

The Queenstown Bank of Maryland has the higher TellerScore (77 vs 61). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Shore United Bank, National Association leads on 2 and The Queenstown Bank of Maryland on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions