TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Signal Financial Federal Credit Union vs Christiansted Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Signal Financial Federal Credit Union

Kensington, Maryland · $100 million – $1 billion

56of 100
Moderate

Credit union

Christiansted Federal Credit Union

Christiansted, U.S. Virgin Islands · Under $100 million in assets

98of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureSignal Financial Federal Credit UnionChristiansted Federal Credit Union
TellerScore5698 (stronger)
Capital cushion43100 (stronger)
Loan quality8292 (stronger)
Earnings1498 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity70100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage9199 (stronger)
Peer percentile13th98th
Total assets$363.9M$34.0M
Deposits / shares$325.0M$26.9M
Capital ratio9.34%20.63% (stronger)
Problem loans0.53%0.23% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.30%0.22% (stronger)
Return on assets-0.14%1.96% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits89.8%45.3% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits9.0%1.0% (stronger)
Offices13
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Christiansted Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (98 vs 56). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Signal Financial Federal Credit Union leads on 0 and Christiansted Federal Credit Union on 7. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions