Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Sound Federal Credit Union vs Sikorsky Financial Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Sound Federal Credit Union | Sikorsky Financial Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 53 | 84 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 26 | 79 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 52 | 92 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 80 (stronger) | 77 |
| Funding & liquidity | 78 | 78 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 43 | 97 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 9th | 93rd |
| Total assets | $115.5M | $1.5B |
| Deposits / shares | $105.2M | $1.3B |
| Capital ratio | 7.60% | 12.93% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 1.43% | 0.25% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.35% | 0.11% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.51% (stronger) | 1.42% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 82.5% (stronger) | 82.6% |
| Uninsured deposits | 3.1% (stronger) | 4.7% |
| Offices | 2 | 11 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Sikorsky Financial Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (84 vs 53). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Sound Federal Credit Union leads on 3 and Sikorsky Financial Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.