Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
South Ottumwa Savings Bank vs Hills Bank and Trust Company
Metric by metric
| Measure | South Ottumwa Savings Bank | Hills Bank and Trust Company |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 77 | 84 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 80 | 84 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 72 | 87 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 76 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 70 (stronger) | 48 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 93 | 96 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 68th | 95th |
| Total assets | $565.4M | $4.8B |
| Deposits / shares | $473.9M | $3.5B |
| Capital ratio | 13.00% | 13.36% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.83% | 0.40% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.03% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.40% | 2.08% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 67.7% (stronger) | 102.2% |
| Uninsured deposits | 35.1% | 23.8% (stronger) |
| Offices | 5 | 19 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 6.6% |
Hills Bank and Trust Company has the higher TellerScore (84 vs 77). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), South Ottumwa Savings Bank leads on 1 and Hills Bank and Trust Company on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.