TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Southern Lakes Credit Union vs Abbott Laboratories Credit Union

Credit union

Southern Lakes Credit Union

Kenosha, Wisconsin · $100 million – $1 billion

65of 100
Moderate

Credit union

Abbott Laboratories Credit Union

Gurnee, Illinois · $1 billion – $10 billion

89of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureSouthern Lakes Credit UnionAbbott Laboratories Credit Union
TellerScore6589 (stronger)
Capital cushion4795 (stronger)
Loan quality7696 (stronger)
Earnings4458 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity9498 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage9199 (stronger)
Peer percentile34th97th
Total assets$112.6M$1.1B
Deposits / shares$101.0M$981.6M
Capital ratio9.73%14.49% (stronger)
Problem loans0.73%0.11% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.15% (stronger)0.16%
Return on assets0.59%0.95% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits66.5%62.6% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits4.7%0.0% (stronger)
Offices311
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Abbott Laboratories Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (89 vs 65). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Southern Lakes Credit Union leads on 1 and Abbott Laboratories Credit Union on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions