TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Sycamore Federal Credit Union vs Coosa Pines Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Sycamore Federal Credit Union

Sycamore, Alabama · Under $100 million in assets

87of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Coosa Pines Federal Credit Union

Childersburg, Alabama · $100 million – $1 billion

88of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureSycamore Federal Credit UnionCoosa Pines Federal Credit Union
TellerScore8788 (stronger)
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality7071 (stronger)
Earnings96 (stronger)91
Funding & liquidity7588 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage9293 (stronger)
Peer percentile83rd92nd
Total assets$77.1M$420.8M
Deposits / shares$64.3M$356.6M
Capital ratio16.37% (stronger)16.20%
Problem loans0.89%0.87% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.39% (stronger)0.70%
Return on assets1.89% (stronger)1.77%
Loans ÷ deposits84.8%72.3% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits12.8%7.3% (stronger)
Offices14
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—5.1%

Coosa Pines Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 87). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Sycamore Federal Credit Union leads on 3 and Coosa Pines Federal Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions