Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Tanager Bank vs NBH Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Tanager Bank | NBH Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 74 (stronger) | 66 |
| Capital cushion | 98 (stronger) | 53 |
| Loan quality | 80 | 80 |
| Earnings | 31 | 64 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 57 (stronger) | 51 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 98 (stronger) | 93 |
| Peer percentile | 57th | 58th |
| Total assets | $222.3M | $12.5B |
| Deposits / shares | $179.0M | $10.6B |
| Capital ratio | 14.79% (stronger) | 10.27% |
| Problem loans | 0.59% (stronger) | 0.60% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.32% |
| Return on assets | 0.29% | 1.09% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 41.8% (stronger) | 91.8% |
| Uninsured deposits | 53.7% | 30.4% (stronger) |
| Offices | 4 | 91 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 16.8% |
Tanager Bank has the higher TellerScore (74 vs 66). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Tanager Bank leads on 5 and NBH Bank on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.