Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Tee-Pak Credit Union vs Landmark Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Tee-Pak Credit Union | Landmark Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 79 (stronger) | 66 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 49 |
| Loan quality | 70 | 83 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 33 (stronger) | 29 |
| Funding & liquidity | 100 | 100 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 95 | 96 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 62nd | 37th |
| Total assets | $23.8M | $119.1M |
| Deposits / shares | $19.8M | $105.9M |
| Capital ratio | 16.28% (stronger) | 9.92% |
| Problem loans | 0.89% | 0.50% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.55% | 0.42% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.32% (stronger) | 0.23% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 60.1% | 41.8% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 2.0% | 1.4% (stronger) |
| Offices | 1 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Tee-Pak Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (79 vs 66). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Tee-Pak Credit Union leads on 3 and Landmark Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.