Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Texas Community Bank vs Naft Federal Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Texas Community Bank | Naft Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 84 | 93 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 78 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 93 (stronger) | 83 |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 89 |
| Funding & liquidity | 50 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 98 (stronger) | 97 |
| Peer percentile | 95th | 97th |
| Total assets | $2.2B | $162.3M |
| Deposits / shares | $1.9B | $135.7M |
| Capital ratio | 12.78% | 16.44% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.20% (stronger) | 0.50% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.05% (stronger) | 0.24% |
| Return on assets | 2.03% (stronger) | 1.73% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 58.6% | 51.3% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 63.9% | 1.3% (stronger) |
| Offices | 10 | 3 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 7.9% | — |
Naft Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (93 vs 84). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Texas Community Bank leads on 3 and Naft Federal Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.