Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
The Bank of Forest vs BankFirst Financial Services
Metric by metric
| Measure | The Bank of Forest | BankFirst Financial Services |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 68 | 69 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 59 | 59 |
| Loan quality | 57 | 74 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 77 (stronger) | 64 |
| Funding & liquidity | 80 (stronger) | 70 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 84 | 92 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 37th | 53rd |
| Total assets | $296.3M | $3.3B |
| Deposits / shares | $269.0M | $2.8B |
| Capital ratio | 10.91% (stronger) | 10.86% |
| Problem loans | 1.30% | 0.77% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.04% (stronger) | 0.10% |
| Return on assets | 1.41% (stronger) | 1.10% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 61.1% (stronger) | 79.3% |
| Uninsured deposits | 32.0% | 24.3% (stronger) |
| Offices | 3 | 44 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 0.9% | 7.5% |
BankFirst Financial Services has the higher TellerScore (69 vs 68). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), The Bank of Forest leads on 4 and BankFirst Financial Services on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.