Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
The Bank of Forest vs First Southern Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | The Bank of Forest | First Southern Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 68 | 83 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 59 (stronger) | 56 |
| Loan quality | 57 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 77 | 95 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 80 (stronger) | 79 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 84 | 99 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 37th | 84th |
| Total assets | $296.3M | $317.3M |
| Deposits / shares | $269.0M | $271.4M |
| Capital ratio | 10.91% (stronger) | 10.57% |
| Problem loans | 1.30% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.04% (stronger) | 0.09% |
| Return on assets | 1.41% | 1.89% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 61.1% | 54.2% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 32.0% (stronger) | 34.1% |
| Offices | 3 | 6 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 0.9% | — |
First Southern Bank has the higher TellerScore (83 vs 68). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), The Bank of Forest leads on 3 and First Southern Bank on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.