Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
The Bank of Forest vs Great Southern Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | The Bank of Forest | Great Southern Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 68 (stronger) | 66 |
| Capital cushion | 59 (stronger) | 45 |
| Loan quality | 57 | 78 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 77 (stronger) | 47 |
| Funding & liquidity | 80 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 84 | 86 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 37th | 31st |
| Total assets | $296.3M | $355.1M |
| Deposits / shares | $269.0M | $312.0M |
| Capital ratio | 10.91% (stronger) | 9.49% |
| Problem loans | 1.30% | 0.67% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.04% | 0.02% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.41% (stronger) | 0.67% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 61.1% | 45.8% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 32.0% | 14.6% (stronger) |
| Offices | 3 | 11 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 0.9% | 4.8% |
The Bank of Forest has the higher TellerScore (68 vs 66). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), The Bank of Forest leads on 3 and Great Southern Bank on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.