TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

The Bank of Forest vs The Citizens Bank of Philadelphia, Mississippi

Bank

The Bank of Forest

Forest, Mississippi · $100 million – $1 billion

68of 100
Moderate

Bank

The Citizens Bank of Philadelphia, Mississippi

Philadelphia, Mississippi · $1 billion – $10 billion

66of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureThe Bank of ForestThe Citizens Bank of Philadelphia, Mississippi
TellerScore68 (stronger)66
Capital cushion59 (stronger)41
Loan quality5784 (stronger)
Earnings77 (stronger)52
Funding & liquidity8092 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage8488 (stronger)
Peer percentile37th40th
Total assets$296.3M$1.6B
Deposits / shares$269.0M$1.3B
Capital ratio10.91% (stronger)9.11%
Problem loans1.30%0.47% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.04% (stronger)0.29%
Return on assets1.41% (stronger)0.80%
Loans ÷ deposits61.1% (stronger)67.1%
Uninsured deposits32.0%16.6% (stronger)
Offices326
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)0.9%—

The Bank of Forest has the higher TellerScore (68 vs 66). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), The Bank of Forest leads on 5 and The Citizens Bank of Philadelphia, Mississippi on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions