Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
The Bank of Tampa vs Pibank, National Association
Metric by metric
| Measure | The Bank of Tampa | Pibank, National Association |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 70 (stronger) | 63 |
| Capital cushion | 60 (stronger) | 47 |
| Loan quality | 90 | 96 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 70 (stronger) | 1 |
| Funding & liquidity | 42 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 96 | 99 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 58th | 30th |
| Total assets | $3.0B | $2.4B |
| Deposits / shares | $2.7B | $2.1B |
| Capital ratio | 10.97% (stronger) | 9.71% |
| Problem loans | 0.29% | 0.13% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.03% (stronger) | 0.05% |
| Return on assets | 1.25% (stronger) | -0.49% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 75.7% | 53.3% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 53.4% | 9.9% (stronger) |
| Offices | 13 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 24.9% | 15.2% |
The Bank of Tampa has the higher TellerScore (70 vs 63). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), The Bank of Tampa leads on 4 and Pibank, National Association on 3. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.