Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
The Cecilian Bank vs Forcht Bank, National Association
Metric by metric
| Measure | The Cecilian Bank | Forcht Bank, National Association |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 77 (stronger) | 66 |
| Capital cushion | 60 (stronger) | 32 |
| Loan quality | 87 | 98 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 87 (stronger) | 50 |
| Funding & liquidity | 66 | 80 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 95 | 99 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 83rd | 40th |
| Total assets | $1.6B | $1.6B |
| Deposits / shares | $1.3B | $1.5B |
| Capital ratio | 10.99% (stronger) | 8.16% |
| Problem loans | 0.40% | 0.05% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.01% | 0.01% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.67% (stronger) | 0.74% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 79.5% | 75.1% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 28.6% | 19.9% (stronger) |
| Offices | 19 | 22 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 11.4% | — |
The Cecilian Bank has the higher TellerScore (77 vs 66). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), The Cecilian Bank leads on 3 and Forcht Bank, National Association on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.