Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
The First Security Bank vs TriCentury Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | The First Security Bank | TriCentury Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 56 | 77 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 30 | 58 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 33 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 87 |
| Funding & liquidity | 79 (stronger) | 50 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 70 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 13th | 68th |
| Total assets | $225.6M | $213.8M |
| Deposits / shares | $191.4M | $135.1M |
| Capital ratio | 7.98% | 10.76% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 2.00% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.52% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 2.91% (stronger) | 1.68% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 80.8% (stronger) | 131.0% |
| Uninsured deposits | 13.8% | 13.2% (stronger) |
| Offices | 8 | 3 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 3.9% | — |
TriCentury Bank has the higher TellerScore (77 vs 56). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), The First Security Bank leads on 2 and TriCentury Bank on 5. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.