Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
The Fountain Trust Company vs Tee-Pak Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | The Fountain Trust Company | Tee-Pak Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 69 | 79 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 50 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 79 (stronger) | 70 |
| Earnings | 62 (stronger) | 33 |
| Funding & liquidity | 85 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 94 | 95 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 40th | 62nd |
| Total assets | $844.6M | $23.8M |
| Deposits / shares | $744.1M | $19.8M |
| Capital ratio | 9.99% | 16.28% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.63% (stronger) | 0.89% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.09% (stronger) | 0.55% |
| Return on assets | 1.04% (stronger) | 0.32% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 69.0% | 60.1% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 20.7% | 2.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 20 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 23.8% | — |
Tee-Pak Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (79 vs 69). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), The Fountain Trust Company leads on 3 and Tee-Pak Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.