Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
The Haverford Trust Company vs Investment Savings Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | The Haverford Trust Company | Investment Savings Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 90 (stronger) | 86 |
| Capital cushion | 100 | 100 |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 96 |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 36 |
| Funding & liquidity | 35 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 99 |
| Peer percentile | 95th | 90th |
| Total assets | $191.0M | $105.2M |
| Deposits / shares | $128.7M | $75.5M |
| Capital ratio | 22.49% (stronger) | 21.72% |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.13% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.05% |
| Return on assets | 8.63% (stronger) | 0.41% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 100.5% | 58.6% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 37.3% | 4.4% (stronger) |
| Offices | 1 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 14.6% |
The Haverford Trust Company has the higher TellerScore (90 vs 86). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), The Haverford Trust Company leads on 5 and Investment Savings Bank on 2. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.