Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
The Lamesa National Bank vs First United Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | The Lamesa National Bank | First United Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 73 | 77 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 70 (stronger) | 62 |
| Loan quality | 42 | 86 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 100 | 100 |
| Funding & liquidity | 78 (stronger) | 51 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 96 (stronger) | 95 |
| Peer percentile | 53rd | 83rd |
| Total assets | $426.8M | $2.4B |
| Deposits / shares | $375.1M | $2.1B |
| Capital ratio | 11.95% (stronger) | 11.17% |
| Problem loans | 1.74% | 0.41% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | -0.02% (stronger) | 0.10% |
| Return on assets | 2.24% (stronger) | 2.03% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 15.8% (stronger) | 69.8% |
| Uninsured deposits | 35.1% (stronger) | 50.2% |
| Offices | 1 | 23 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 1.9% |
First United Bank has the higher TellerScore (77 vs 73). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), The Lamesa National Bank leads on 5 and First United Bank on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.
Where both have branches
- Lamesa, TX