TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

The Lincoln National Bank of Hodgenville vs The First National Bank of Russell Springs

Bank

The Lincoln National Bank of Hodgenville

Hodgenville, Kentucky · $100 million – $1 billion

86of 100
Very strong

Bank

The First National Bank of Russell Springs

Russell Springs, Kentucky · $100 million – $1 billion

73of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureThe Lincoln National Bank of HodgenvilleThe First National Bank of Russell Springs
TellerScore86 (stronger)73
Capital cushion99 (stronger)55
Loan quality8696 (stronger)
Earnings7678 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity65 (stronger)46
Problem-loan coverage9598 (stronger)
Peer percentile90th53rd
Total assets$454.4M$475.2M
Deposits / shares$377.8M$409.0M
Capital ratio14.89% (stronger)10.52%
Problem loans0.43%0.11% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.03%0.01% (stronger)
Return on assets1.41%1.45% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits93.8%83.9% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits16.0% (stronger)42.1%
Offices43
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)6.8%—

The Lincoln National Bank of Hodgenville has the higher TellerScore (86 vs 73). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), The Lincoln National Bank of Hodgenville leads on 3 and The First National Bank of Russell Springs on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions