TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

The Port Washington State Bank vs Great Midwest Bank, S.S.B.

Bank

The Port Washington State Bank

Port Washington, Wisconsin · $1 billion – $10 billion

67of 100
Moderate

Bank

Great Midwest Bank, S.S.B.

Brookfield, Wisconsin · $1 billion – $10 billion

80of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureThe Port Washington State BankGreat Midwest Bank, S.S.B.
TellerScore6780 (stronger)
Capital cushion40100 (stronger)
Loan quality96 (stronger)81
Earnings4966 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity76 (stronger)50
Problem-loan coverage98 (stronger)94
Peer percentile44th90th
Total assets$1.0B$1.1B
Deposits / shares$926.9M$620.8M
Capital ratio8.97%16.50% (stronger)
Problem loans0.11% (stronger)0.56%
Net charge-offs-0.01% (stronger)-0.00%
Return on assets0.72%1.14% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits70.0% (stronger)150.6%
Uninsured deposits27.5%9.6% (stronger)
Offices88
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)4.3%—

Great Midwest Bank, S.S.B. has the higher TellerScore (80 vs 67). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), The Port Washington State Bank leads on 3 and Great Midwest Bank, S.S.B. on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions