TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Tidemark Federal Credit Union vs 1897 Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Tidemark Federal Credit Union

Seaford, Delaware · $100 million – $1 billion

83of 100
Strong

Credit union

1897 Federal Credit Union

Salisbury, Maryland · Under $100 million in assets

84of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureTidemark Federal Credit Union1897 Federal Credit Union
TellerScore8384 (stronger)
Capital cushion94100 (stronger)
Loan quality89100 (stronger)
Earnings40 (stronger)21
Funding & liquidity98100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage98100 (stronger)
Peer percentile83rd75th
Total assets$468.5M$3.6M
Deposits / shares$405.0M$2.5M
Capital ratio14.37%29.46% (stronger)
Problem loans0.33%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.29%-7.60% (stronger)
Return on assets0.51% (stronger)0.03%
Loans ÷ deposits62.5%14.0% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits8.5%0.0% (stronger)
Offices62
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)24.7%—

1897 Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (84 vs 83). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Tidemark Federal Credit Union leads on 1 and 1897 Federal Credit Union on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions