TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

UMB Bank, National Association vs Pacific Valley Bank

Bank

UMB Bank, National Association

Kansas City, Missouri · $10 billion – $100 billion

65of 100
Moderate

Bank

Pacific Valley Bank

Salinas, California · $100 million – $1 billion

70of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureUMB Bank, National AssociationPacific Valley Bank
TellerScore6570 (stronger)
Capital cushion3976 (stronger)
Loan quality8992 (stronger)
Earnings75 (stronger)55
Funding & liquidity43 (stronger)26
Problem-loan coverage9697 (stronger)
Peer percentile54th43rd
Total assets$71.9B$653.3M
Deposits / shares$60.2B$570.5M
Capital ratio8.89%12.60% (stronger)
Problem loans0.34%0.24% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.17%-0.02% (stronger)
Return on assets1.39% (stronger)0.87%
Loans ÷ deposits67.7% (stronger)94.5%
Uninsured deposits63.6%50.7% (stronger)
Offices1894
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)306—
Complaints per $1B deposits5.1—
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)30.5%—

Pacific Valley Bank has the higher TellerScore (70 vs 65). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), UMB Bank, National Association leads on 2 and Pacific Valley Bank on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions