Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
United Minnesota Bank vs St. Martin National Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | United Minnesota Bank | St. Martin National Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 66 | 100 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 28 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 82 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 84 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 75 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 89 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 28th | 100th |
| Total assets | $56.9M | $29.4M |
| Deposits / shares | $52.5M | $25.0M |
| Capital ratio | 7.78% | 15.51% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.54% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | 1.60% | 2.42% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 85.0% | 52.6% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 13.6% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 1 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
St. Martin National Bank has the higher TellerScore (100 vs 66). On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), United Minnesota Bank leads on 0 and St. Martin National Bank on 6. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.