Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Villa Grove State Bank vs CIBM Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Villa Grove State Bank | CIBM Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 86 (stronger) | 53 |
| Capital cushion | 72 (stronger) | 49 |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 64 |
| Earnings | 90 (stronger) | 39 |
| Funding & liquidity | 73 (stronger) | 40 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 84 |
| Peer percentile | 81st | 9th |
| Total assets | $85.9M | $819.7M |
| Deposits / shares | $74.7M | $669.0M |
| Capital ratio | 12.22% (stronger) | 9.91% |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 1.08% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.20% |
| Return on assets | 1.75% (stronger) | 0.48% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 73.3% (stronger) | 98.6% |
| Uninsured deposits | 27.3% (stronger) | 34.2% |
| Offices | 1 | 9 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 4.6% |
Villa Grove State Bank has the higher TellerScore (86 vs 53). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Villa Grove State Bank leads on 7 and CIBM Bank on 0. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.