Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Walden Savings Bank vs First Federal Savings of Middletown
Metric by metric
| Measure | Walden Savings Bank | First Federal Savings of Middletown |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 62 | 89 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 52 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 65 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 60 | 94 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 64 (stronger) | 37 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 84 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 27th | 94th |
| Total assets | $1.0B | $188.0M |
| Deposits / shares | $819.6M | $112.3M |
| Capital ratio | 10.19% | 36.94% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 1.05% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.03% (stronger) | 0.46% |
| Return on assets | 1.01% | 1.86% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 96.2% (stronger) | 132.6% |
| Uninsured deposits | 14.8% (stronger) | 26.9% |
| Offices | 11 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
First Federal Savings of Middletown has the higher TellerScore (89 vs 62). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Walden Savings Bank leads on 3 and First Federal Savings of Middletown on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.